Blood sports debate essay
This resource hasn't been reviewed. Essay Categories:. For instancein case of bullfighting and cockfightinganimals get injured and finally died because of the poor negligence from the human side.
Writing task 2related to sports
They have been a vital part of almost every culture centuries ago. Discuss the main arguments for this statement and give your own opinion. Anyway, I think, there is a significant problem of blood sports such as psychological aspect about relationships between people and animals. Research shows a close connection between dominant ideas about masculinity and the high rate of injuries in many sports. For example, if someone watches a match and gets into a fight with another person later on, that person is more likely to use a technique he saw during the fight, and since there is no referee to stop the fight in case of suffocation or tap-out, the victim is more likely to bleed, pass out or even dies. As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed. In the presence of the senile or disabled we feel sorry for them because they lack the faculties that humans normally possess. Therefore, both humans and animals should enjoy equal moral consideration. However, apart from mythological relevance, these have been one of the major sources of entertainment for the kings and kshatriyas in the olden days. Moreover, they are not in the recent era and proliferating quickly, instead they are the successor of the previous old tradition. Despite all the disagreeing discussion of the topic mentioned above, there are still some certain agreeing arguments exist for this particular issue. For example, the illegal countries are one of the leading income sources for the people who put bets on the winning animal. To what extent to you agree or disagree?
Technology provides more humane ways of killing, e. It may not be possible to reach traps in time to prevent animals injuring themselves trying to escape.
Inorder to stop this cruelty towards animalsgoverment should make strong laws for animal protection and give hard punishment to the rule violators. Evidence from America shows a strong positive correlation between increases in hunting and the numbers of game species, largely because hunting provides an incentive to protect land rather than manage it purely in the interests of agriculture.
As society develops it is increasingly seen as an uncivilized activity and cruel to the helpless animals that are killed.
What is blood sports
Therefore, it might need lots of improvements. To conclude, I see only bad issues and a lack of people quantities rather than some beneficial aspects of that problem. Discuss the main arguments for this statement and give your own opinion. I was like a tree that had been cut down, teetering, then crashing, unable to break my fall. Human race has always been fascinated with violence right from the beginning of human civilization. Blood sports are category of sports that largely involve animals and lead to bloodshed while playing them. Many of the supposed alternatives to hunting with dogs are impractical. Common sense tells us that there is a difference between animals and humans. Yes, they have been in discussions over the last couple of years for a variety of reasons. All blood sports should be banned. The test for whether beings should enjoy moral significance is their capacity to feel pain. There are several shreds of evidence about the existence of animals in games in the historical documents. Therefore, both humans and animals should enjoy equal moral consideration. It is limpid to watch but hard to play.
Essay Categories:. Discuss the main arguments for this statement and give your own opinion.
based on 6 review